I need to read application properties in a class from a .properties file that forms a point for application properties Should work in What is the recommended method for such a class: define those properties as a fixed variable or in the example variable with singleton patterns?
I have a myapp.properties
file in the format key = value . Let's say that there are two application properties defined in this file:
company = ABC batchism = 1000
At the application startup I will read this file whenever I use application properties in a class ApplicationProperties
I will use this class if I need it
I have 2 options:
Option 1: Application properties Defined as static variables:
public class ApplicationProperties {private static string company; Private static id BATCH_SIZE; Static {// read myapp.properties file and static variable computing & amp; BATCH_SIZE} Private ApplicationsApplications () {} Public Stabilized String Millcompany () {Return Company; } Public stable difference getBatchSize () {Return BATCH_SIZE; }}
Option 2: Define the application properties as an example variable:
public class ApplicationProperties {Personal Static ApplicationProperties INSTANCE = New ApplicationApplications (); Private string company; Private int batch size; Private ApplicationsApplications () {// read myapp.properties file and frequency variable computing & amp; Batch system) public static applicationProperties getInstance () {return INSTANCE; } Public string getCompany () {return.company; } Public int getBatchSize () {return.batchSize; }}
For option 1 I will arrive this way:
ApplicationProperties.getCompany (); ApplicationProperties.getBatchSize ();
For option 2, I would like to reach out to:
ApplicationProperties.getInstance (). GetCompany (); . ApplicationProperties.getInstance () getBatchSize ();
Which is better? And why?
If the answer to this question has been answered first, please answer.
Option 2 is a bit more complex and verbose without offering any benefit So, option 1 is better design.
IMHO is not "opinion-based".
No comments:
Post a Comment